Interesting Voting Rights Act decision in Ohio

July 15, 2009

from Ballot Access News
Federal Court in Ohio Approves Limited Voting for Euclid School Board Elections

July 15th, 2009

On July 13, U.S. District Court Judge Kathleen O’Malley ruled that the city of Euclid, Ohio, should use Limited Voting in its school board elections. The decision, USA v Euclid City School Board, is here.

Euclid has a 5-member School Board, and the city has long used at-large elections for the School Board. Voters elect 3 members in years after presidential elections, and 2 members in years before presidential elections. Euclid’s population is 44.6% African-American, yet no African-American has ever been elected to the School Board. The U.S. Department of Justice had sued Euclid under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and had asked the judge to order single-member districts. The city argued for either Limited Voting or Cumulative Voting. The judge ruled in favor of Limited Voting.

Limited voting means that each voter can only vote for one candidate, even though either two or three candidates are being elected.


NY statewide poll: Governor approval, Legislature approval and Term Limits

July 10, 2009

Thanks to Ballot Acces News for the story.

WGRZ TV
Term Limits: What You Think, Governor Reacts

Frustrated, fuming and fed up. That’s what 2 On Your Side is hearing from you about Albany politicians in your emails, in online chats and in your phone calls.

One idea that came to us several times in emails, term limits…

Among the questions we asked [in a wgrz/SurveyUSA telephone poll]; ’should there be a limit to the number of terms new york state legislators are allowed to serve?’

Nearly 80 percent said yes, that’s nearly eight out of 10 people in the state… Read the rest of this entry »


Investment Guru: Which third party will replace the Republicans?

July 9, 2009

Hat tip to Ballot Access News for the story and background…

Timothy Lutts is an investment adviser with a popular newsletter. Lutts wrote an article which includes wonderful lists of third parties of the past. His article starts by reacting to the recent Republican failures and scandals — ie: Sarah Palin and Mark Sandford — and wondering what will happen next. Lutts proposes that the Libertarian Party could become the replacement for the Republican Party. (And, if you read his whole article, at his site, you will see why Lutts dismisses the Green Party as a possible new, second party…)

Excerpts-only below:

(excerpts from) The Iconoclast Investor
Long-Term Trends of our Political Parties
by Timothy Lutts / July 8th, 2009

…I’ve been working on a bigger perspective, wondering whether the Republican Party has become so weakened in recent years that it’s created an opportunity for a new counterweight to the Democratic Party.  I pledge allegiance to neither, but deep interest in both; after all, they have the power.  But change happens; in fact, you can’t stop change from happening.  So today I want to look at the potential for major change on the political party front in the years ahead. Read the rest of this entry »


So-called Working Families Party locks the most progressive candidate out of NYC Mayor debate

July 5, 2009

Ever since Working Families Party sold the pro-war candidates of Clinton and Spitzer as a vote for peace in 2006, I expect nothing from them.  And have not been disappointed.

from the Village Voice

Last night three candidates for Mayor of New York — Michael Bloomberg, councilmember Tony Avella, and comptroller Bill Thompson — attended the Working Families Party Mayoral Forum at the Hotel Trades Council on West 44th Street. (We should mention that Green Party candidate Reverend Billy wanted to be at the forum, but was excluded; “The Working Families Party have sent a cynical signal,” his office tells us. “New York is not a corporation. New York is a city. A city in a democracy. Let’s debate like it is.”)

Related:


In the spirit of the 4th: Class in DC on “Democratizing the Electoral College”

July 4, 2009

What better way to celebrate the 4th of July, than to sign up for a class about strengthening our democracy?

Asa Gordon is Chair of the D.C Statehood Green Party Electoral College Task Force; a member of the Green Party Black Caucus Organizing Committee; and is the founder and Executive Director of the Douglass Institute of Government (DIG).

“Democratizing the Electoral College”
Thursday, July 16th, 2009
6:45-8:45pm
Instructor: Asa Gordon
Presented through: The Social Action & Leadership School for Activists (SALSA) of the Institute for Policy Studies
Location: The offices of the IPS, 1112 16th Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20005
Class description and links: here
Questions: Call (202)234-9382, ext. 229 or send e-mail to netfa at hotsalsa dot org


Read the rest of this entry »


NY State Senate: Sunday, June 28th update

June 28, 2009

For those of you keeping track: Since Governor Paterson (D) is demanding that the NY State Senators “do their job”, each conference – the Democrats and the Republicans – gaveled in and gaveled out separately, both under 3 minutes. Working on a Sunday. Pretty strange…

Also, the Democrats are running ads trying to pressure Republicans to stop it with the coup. Here is an example of the Democrats’ youtube ad. Read the rest of this entry »


Had enough of being abandoned by your party? Come home to the Green Party

June 27, 2009

Green Party, preparing for 2009 national meeting, ask: Is America ready for a real opposition party now?

• Citing Democrats’ votes for war funding and retreats on health care, Greens call Dems “the new wing of the GOP” and invite Americans to “come home to the Green Party”

• Green Party Annual National meeting: Durham, North Carolina, July 23-26

Green Party leaders, preparing for the party’s 2009 Annual National Meeting, said that America is in desperate need of a real opposition party, as Democrats maintain Republican positions on foreign policy, health care, the environment, and other big issues.

“Democratic leaders made their party a wing of the Republican Party in June,” said Wayne Turner, North Carolina Green Party co-chair (http://www.ncgreenparty.org). “Any progressive positions taken by the Obama administration are getting nullified by Blue Dog Democrats and other Republican allies.  The Democratic leadership and mainstream have adopted values we associate with the GOP, while Republicans are taking ever more extreme positions and want to see President Obama fail at whatever he sets out to accomplish.  That leaves two parties representing corporate lobbies and the Green Party representing the interests and ideals of most Americans.  ‘Across the aisle’ used to mean Democrats and Republicans.  Now both of them are across the aisle from the rest of America.”

“With President Obama expanding the war in Afghanistan and Democrats overwhelmingly voting for war funding, the Democratic Party can no longer pretend to be the antiwar party.  We invite voters who want peace to come home to the Green Party,” said Mr. Turner.

Greens cited widespread popular opposition to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, support for a national health care plan that covers all Americans (http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE55K00220090621), and resentment over the Wall Street bailout as evidence that the Green Party is closer to the political sentiments of a majority of Americans.

Green leaders pointed to several decisions and actions in June that betray the Obama promise of change:

• 256 Democrats in the House voted for the war funding bill, with only 30 Democratic nays.  President Obama is also expanding US troops in Afghanistan, with air attacks inside Pakistani borders, and has maintained the Bush-Cheney ‘preemption’ doctrine in threatening Iran.  (Democratic leaders endorsed both wars from the beginning and continued voting for President Bush’s war funding requests after they took control of Congress in 2006.)

• The Democratic leadership’s health care reform plans not only reject Single-Payer, but will also omit the public health care option because it’s “unfair to insurance companies” — as if insurance industry profits were more urgent the health needs of millions of Americans.

• In capitulation to industry interests, the Waxman-Markey climate bill (”American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009″) would place a weak cap on greenhouse gas emissions (reductions of only 1-4% below 1990 levels by 2020), create a $2 trillion carbon-trading market with dangerously unregulated derivatives and minimal effect on emissions, give away 85% of the carbon permits to corporations over the next decade, offer a $150 billion handout to coal companies, and impose a severely inadequate 15% renewable energy standard by 2020.

• President Obama approved mountaintop removal for coal, which will wreak further environmental devastation on states like West Virginia and Tennessee.  The Obama Administration continues to espouse industry myths about ‘clean coal.’

• Despite President Obama’s announcement of some limited domestic partnership benefits for gay federal employees, the Obama Justice Department has submitted a brief in support of the antigay Defense of Marriage Act, undercutting the President’s claim to support equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans.

To this list, Greens added other Democratic betrayals and retreats: the bailout for Wall Street (the largest transfer of wealth from taxpayers to corporations in history); continued warrantless surveillance of US citizens; refusal to hold Bush officials who approved torture and lied to Congress accountable for their actions (with torture continuing at some sites, according to reports); and uninterrupted military aid for Israel despite massive human rights violations against Palestinians.

“Why won’t President Obama and congessional Democrats fight for a cap on credit card interest rates and restoration of Glass-Steagal regulations to prevent financial industry abuses?  The election of a few Greens to Congress would change the dynamic of American politics.  Democrats and Republicans would have to compete with Green candidates, who accept neither corporate campaign contributions nor the influence of corporate lobbies,” said Jody Grage, treasurer of the Green Party of the United States.


Democratic Party challenge to Green Party in Tuscon backfires

June 26, 2009

Love this story about electoral activism and third party strategy! – KW

from Ballot Access News
Democratic Challenge to Greens in Tucson Will Probably Backfire
June 25th, 2009

According to this story in Tucson Weekly, the Tucson Democratic Party’s attempt to keep Greens out of this November’s partisan city council races is likely to backfire.

The Democratic Party challenged Dave Croteau’s petition to get on the Green Party primary ballot in the 7th district. Party primaries are on September 1, 2009. But because Croteau acknowledges that his petition probably doesn’t have enough signatures of Green registrants in the 7th district, he will bow out of the race. Instead, his campaign manager, Dave Ewoldt, will run as a write-in in the Green primary in September for the same seat. Assuming he gets at least 7 write-ins, he will be nominated and appear on the ballot in November.

Furthermore, Tucson Greens are now mulling over having candidates in the third and fifth districts as well. Arizona has a very fair law on the subject of how many write-in votes are needed in a partisan primary for a candidate to be nominated. The number is proportionate to the number of registered voters in that party. Since Greens don’t have a very large registration, their members only need a small number of write-ins to be nominated in the Green Party primary. Thanks to Gregg Jocoy and Green Party Watch for this story.

Dave Croteau can’t be a write-in in the Green Party primary, because in 2005 the legislature said that candidates who try to get on a ballot and fail cannot then qualify as write-in candidates.


NY State Senate: Party switching and accountability

June 26, 2009

Party Switching and Accountability

The Democrats seem to be so stubborn on the coup. Yes, they are avoiding convening as a full body and that seems assertive. But, here and there Democratic leaders keep giving up arguing points and retreating from battles where they could and should push forward.

Some of it is perverse strategy, and has allowed them to gain some ground. [Ie: handling Monserrate (D) with kid gloves, though he did not deserve it.] But, I think what they have won — including Monserrate’s vote –  is only ground they could have had and then some if they just got tough, assertive and logical.

No one should be allowed to call this thing 31-31. It is not! There are not, in anyone’s calculation or imagination, 31 Republicans in the NY State Senate who are forming some kind of equal force against the Democrats in the adding up of who is the majority.

Pedro Espada IS NOT A REPUBLICAN. Read the rest of this entry »


Ex-Congressman Rick Lazio will run for Governor of NY

June 25, 2009

In the article, Newsday lists as possible 2010 Governor candidates: Rick Lazio (who just filed papers) and Rudy Giuliani on the Republican side. And, David Paterson and Andrew Cuomo on the Democratic side. In their poll, Newsday listed as possible choices for Governor candidate:  David Paterson, Rudy Giuliani, Rick Lazio, Peter King, Andrew Cuomo,  Michael Bloomberg and Eliot Spitzer.

(excerpt from) Newsday
Ex-congressman Lazio files papers to run for governor
By Sid Cassese / June 25, 2009

Republican Rick Lazio, the former four-term congressman from Suffolk, is definitely a candidate for governor of New York next year, even though he has not formally announced it…

[Editor's note: Yes, Rick Lazio is the former Congressperson from New York who ran for Senate against Hillary Clinton, and made the mistake of coming out from his podium and pointing his finger.]


New Green Party voice in NY’s 24th

June 25, 2009

from NY’s 24th District Green

24th District Green? There will be some who could comment that I’ve always been a Green, and that may be true in some sense, but I’ve never been registered as a member of the Green Party of New York State before. Still, looking back I can see that the Green Party was always the right place for me.


Nader asks PA Attorney General to return certain campaign contributions

June 24, 2009

Consumer advocate Ralph Nader has run for President of the United States alternately as an independent candidate and as a Green Party candidate.

from Ballot Access News
Nader Asks Pennsylvania Attorney General to Return Campaign Contribution from Firm Under Investigation

June 23rd, 2009

In 2004, the large law firm Reed Smith coordinated the challenge to Ralph Nader’s Pennsylvania petition. In 2008, Tom Corbett, Pennsylvania Attorney General, indicted state employees who worked on the petition challenge on state government time, using government computers and registration records (Pennsylvania ballot access challenges must be made by private individuals, not arms of the government).

The Corbett investigation into “bonusgate” is continuing. It is somewhat plausible that the Attorney General has been mulling over including the law firm in his indictment. On June 22, Ralph Nader noticed that some Pennsylvania attorneys who are part of Reed Smith have made $15,900 in campaign contributions to Attorney General Corbett. Nader issued a press release calling on the Attorney General not to accept contributions from Reed Smith, and the Pittsburgh Post Gazette carried the story here.